Former hedge fund manager claims that Bitcoin, along with all its forks, has already surpassed the US dollar in terms of inflation - community responds with outrage: Fallacy!
The popular "Felder Report" website host and former hedge fund manager Jesse Felder criticized the value of Bitcoin as an asset or currency in a new article, likening investors engaging in such transactions to moths to a flame. However, the Bitcoin community has come out in response, pointing out numerous inaccuracies in the article and suggesting it would have been better left unwritten!
Table of Contents
Please Stop Asking Me About Bitcoin
Jesse Felder posted an article titled "Please Stop Asking Me About Bitcoin" on Twitter yesterday. In the article, Jesse Felder heavily criticized the value of Bitcoin as an asset or currency, stating that investors engaging in such transactions are like moths to a flame, inviting destruction upon themselves.
While everyone has their own preferences, Jesse Felder is not the only one opposed to Bitcoin, nor the most prominent, but the arguments he presented in the article have sparked strong backlash from the Bitcoin community, even suggesting that as a professional in the financial industry, making such inaccurate statements is truly shocking.
So, what did Jesse Felder say that triggered the collective backlash from the Bitcoin community? Firstly, Jesse Felder claims that treating Bitcoin as an investment asset or currency substitute is fundamentally unreasonable. Bitcoin cannot guarantee capital preservation or provide stable returns, so it can only be seen as "speculation" rather than "investment." Additionally, Jesse Felder also stated that Bitcoin has never become a true payment tool, and more importantly, as a tool for storing value, cryptocurrency enthusiasts have witnessed numerous failures. He also questioned the argument that Bitcoin cannot be stolen.
"Despite cryptocurrency believers claiming it's impossible, millions of dollars' worth of Bitcoin have been hacked. I don't like dollars, but at least hackers can't steal $20 from my real-world wallet."
Finally, Jesse Felder pointed to Bitcoin's past experiences of hard forks, criticizing the argument that "Bitcoin's limited supply makes it more attractive than fiat currencies printed unlimitedly by central banks."
"Bitcoin has forked several times, leading to a doubling of the circulating supply and type of Bitcoin. In fact, if you add up all the hard forks Bitcoin has experienced since its creation, the circulation of Bitcoin has actually inflated faster than the U.S. dollar, that's a fact."
In conclusion, Jesse Felder's conclusion is that Bitcoin is essentially a Ponzi scheme, and those entering now will not have a good ending.
Fierce Community Backlash
After the article was published, several well-known figures from the cryptocurrency community came forward to refute Jesse Felder's arguments in the article. Nic Carter, co-founder of Coin Metrics, stated that almost all the content in the article is wrong and shared a previously written article explaining that hard forks do not dilute the value of Bitcoin.
Almost everything in this post is wrong, but I'll be the one to point out that the hard forks did not dilute Bitcoin – they all failedhttps://t.co/obN0aK7McO
— nic carnival barker carter (@nic__carter) November 18, 2020
Anthony Pompliano, co-founder of Morgan Creek, stated that the arguments in the article are really inaccurate and expressed that if Jesse Felder is open-minded, he would be happy to have a phone call to help him understand Bitcoin correctly.
Wow. This is really inaccurate, Jesse.
Happy to jump on a call and explain what you may be missing.
Just DM me if you're open-minded and want to learn.
— Pomp 🌪 (@APompliano) November 18, 2020
Alex Gladstein, Chief Strategy Officer of the Human Rights Foundation, unleashed strong criticism, pointing out that Jesse Felder was lazy in his research and shouldn't have written the article. Lawrence Lepard, founder of Equity Management Associates, listed all the errors in the article one by one.
It has been hacked. Wrong.
Forks multiply it's supply many times. Wrong.
It is not a store of value. Wrong.
It could be supplanted by a better crypto. Wrong. Google Metcalfe's law.
Doesn't provide safety of principal. Wrong.
Doesn't provide an adequate return. Wrong. https://t.co/sp3Ustouym— Lawrence Lepard, "fix the money, fix the world" (@LawrenceLepard) November 18, 2020
Related
- Trump Administration May SEC Chairman Nominee, Robinhood Legal Chief to Replace Gary Gensler
- Coin Center Executive Director Steps Down, Policy Advocacy Organization to Continue Defending Cryptocurrency
- Vitalik announces that starting next year, he will only discuss Layer 2 solutions that have reached Stage 1, in response to community concerns about token sales.