Steaker Follow-up | Court documents reveal bankruptcy declaration ruling, official response: Team did not file for bankruptcy

share
Steaker Follow-up | Court documents reveal bankruptcy declaration ruling, official response: Team did not file for bankruptcy

According to the content of the Judicial Yuan's ruling, the applicants named Saugios Technologijos UAB and Pascal Marco Caversaccio appealed to the Taipei District Court claiming bankruptcy of Steaker (Seychelles-based Sidetech Technology Limited) company. The identity of the applicants is currently unclear. However, due to incomplete information submitted by the applicants, the Taipei District Court has requested the company to supplement asset amount proof, property status statement, tax information, list of creditors, and other documents within 30 days after the ruling is delivered; otherwise, the application will be rejected.

Table of Contents

According to the content of the judgment issued by the Judicial Yuan, the applicants named Saugios Technologijos UAB and Pascal Marco Caversaccio claimed bankruptcy of the company Steaker (Seychelles-based Sediq Technology Limited) to the Taipei District Court. The identity of the applicants is currently unknown. However, due to incomplete information submitted by the applicants, the Taipei District Court has requested the company to provide proof of assets, explanation of financial status, tax information, list of creditors, and other documents within 30 days after the ruling is delivered; otherwise, the application will be rejected.

Update at 19:45 - Official Response from Steaker:

This case involves someone else claiming bankruptcy of Steaker to the court, and the team has not filed for bankruptcy. The content of the judgment link does not indicate a successful bankruptcy application.

The content of the judgment states:

"As the value of the bankruptcy estate is not fully stated and the evidence presented is insufficient, the court is unable to verify the amount, and there are other items that need to be corrected as shown in the attached list. The applicant is ordered to correct the above items within 30 days after the ruling is delivered; failure to do so will result in the rejection of the application."